Input / Request
Operational requests enter with context bound — source, policy scope, and correlation identifiers attached.
request.received AISERV SYSTEMS
Built for workflows that cannot fail silently.
We engineer platforms where traceability, access governance, and secure information handling are first-class architecture.
Built for environments where visibility, continuity, and audit reconstruction are requirements—not afterthoughts.
Madrid · Software infrastructure · Spain and Europe
Workflow status
Activewf_ops_8f2a
Trace events
Access governance
Time-bound authorization window
verifiedAudit record
Evidence chain append-only
Company
AISERV SYSTEMS designs production platforms and applied research programs for institutions that cannot rely on informal logs or silent failures.
Operational infrastructure for traceability, document governance, and access control across sensitive workflows.
ops.platform · liveApplied computer vision and biomechanical analysis for contact sports—operational research and competitive safety.
rd.bio · evalAutomation with human validation, governed execution, and verifiable event reconstruction.
auto.hitl · governedEvidence-oriented systems, least privilege, and institutional resilience for critical environments.
sec.audit · immutableAISERV SYSTEMS · research initiative
FightSafe AI
Experimental systems engineering for supervised review—not autonomous officiating.
FightSafe AI is an applied research program in multi-source computer vision, temporal signal fusion, and operator review tooling for live and post-hoc monitoring workflows.
Engineering focus: interpretable event intervals, fusion evidence traces, and mandatory human confirmation gates. No clinical claims, injury-prevention marketing, or device certification is implied.
Pose estimation · schematic
Event reconstruction
frame.align Multi-source align signal.dense Dense trace ingest episode.merge Temporal consolidate review.enqueue Operator queue Review queue
Kinematic cues under partial observability
backends · ablation Multi-source alignment & episode merge
eval harness Operator queues & evidence export
pipeline integration Modular perception layers for kinematic and postural cues—replaceable backends, fusion-first architecture.
Dense signal traces consolidate into sparse review episodes with merge rules aligned to live and post-hoc review.
Operators confirm, reject, or escalate intervals with auditable evidence—mandatory authority on every surfaced cue.
Interpretable aggregation over biomechanical, postural, and behavioral families—bounded triage, not autonomous action.
Session metadata, fusion exports, and observability for log replay, technical evaluation, and reconstruction.
Per-frame evidence and consolidation operators so reviewers trace scores to contributing signal families.
signal.surface Candidate interval fusion.explain Fusion evidence bind review.triage Operator triage review.confirm Human confirmation audit.record Review record append Dissemination
Manuscripts in preparation address multi-source temporal fusion and operator-supervised review workflow design. Work is scoped for technical peer review—nothing on this site is presented as already published or clinically validated.
FightSafe AI is an AISERV research initiative. Not a medical device, autonomous referee, or diagnostic product.
Security engineering
AISERV builds security-oriented infrastructure for environments that require strong traceability, governed access, and reconstructable evidence. Engineering criteria align with ENS-oriented assessment work and CCN-STIC hardening references—access paths, platform boundaries, and verifiable records are defined in architecture, not added later.
Service boundaries, access models, and evidence paths are defined before production scope expands. Security architecture compatible with ENS-oriented assessment work—designed for environments where traceability and governance are architectural primitives.
Static delivery without an application runtime on the public path; no secrets in the repository; hardened transport at the edge. Inspired by high-security hardening patterns used in institutional perimeter design.
Authenticated service limits, explicit state-change policy, and verifiable side-effects on sensitive operations. Boundaries shaped so operational records remain reconstructable under technical evaluation and governance review.
Verification isolated from content stores; bounded attempts and logged outcomes before exposure. Governed paths for patient-facing and operator-facing access—aligned with high-level access-control expectations without opening internal systems.
Correlated, append-oriented events across delivery, access, and lifecycle—verifiable operational records built for reconstruction when assessment, audit, or incident response requires proof.
Scoped roles, tokens, and integration credentials with policy enforced before routing. Segregated trust between operators, services, and integration endpoints.
One reconstructable chain from request through handoff, access, and storage. Operational traceability as an engineering default in platforms where silent failure is unacceptable.
Protected secrets, verified dependencies, and documented security headers in production. Deployment discipline so access policies and evidence retention remain enforceable after release.
Report suspected vulnerabilities in AISERV SYSTEMS infrastructure or supported deployments privately before public disclosure. See SECURITY.md for scope and coordination. AISERV does not operate a paid bug bounty programme.
Reference frameworks
Spanish and EU reference frameworks for engineering evaluation—ENS, CCN-STIC, data protection, electronic trust, and sector guidance on clinical information handling.
Real Decreto 311/2022 and CCN-CNI normativa—engineering context for service categorisation, security measures, and operational evidence in ENS-oriented assessment work.
CCN catalogues and STIC implementation guides—reference for hardening patterns, operational security controls, and technical evaluation narratives.
EU and Spanish data protection framework for minimisation, purpose limitation in logs, and accountability-oriented processing design.
EU electronic trust framework—context for strong recipient-verification and signature patterns where institutional policy requires them.
Ley 41/2002—Spanish framework for patient-facing information, clinical documentation handling, and proportionate access in healthcare workflows.
AEPD sector guide on health-data handling, proportionality, and operational accountability in clinical environments.
These references are used as engineering context and evaluation criteria, not as a public claim of certification.
Contact
TRACIUM scope, security-oriented infrastructure, or applied research engagements. Direct engineering contact—no reseller or generic sales intake.